Great video on the impact of labels placed on kids.
https://www.youcubed.org/rethinking-giftedness-film/
Saturday, November 11, 2017
Thursday, October 12, 2017
A Reminder to All Educators
We shouldn't to have to be reminded to build on kids strengths rather than focus on their personal challenges. Nevertheless, sometimes reminders kick us in the shins and force us to look again at an issue and adjust our thinking or our actions. This powerful article may be the kick some of us need.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/opinion/learning-disabilities-attention-deficit.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/opinion/learning-disabilities-attention-deficit.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
Monday, August 14, 2017
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Thursday, May 11, 2017
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
Master Schedule Forms
Student Schedules
|
Student
|
Period 1
|
Period 2
|
Period 3
|
Period 4
|
Period 5
|
Period 6
|
|
Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bella
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City High Master Schedule
|
Teacher
|
Room #
|
Period1
|
Period 2
|
Period 3
|
Period 4
|
Prior 5
|
Period 6
|
|
,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Colorado Teacher Evaluation Reform
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/04/06/how-we-got-colorados-teacher-evaluation-reform-wrong.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2
Take-Aways
- Colorado Senate Bill 10-191 - law required that 50 percent of a teacher evaluation be based upon student academic growth
- Teachers could gain or lose tenure based on the merits of their impact on student achievement.
- Many thought the law would allow the best teachers "to shine", be differentiated on an objective scale of effectiveness, lose tenure if they were not performing, and no longer be treated as interchangeable widgets.
- Backed by "Ivy League" research that made clear case for changes to former system.
- Funding from federal incentives, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other private philanthropy.
- Support came from both Republicans and Democrats as well as the American Federation of Teachers.
- Recently released results show that 88% of teachers were rated effective or highly effective, 4% were partially effective, 7.8% were not rated and 1% were rated ineffective.
- New policy was built on data that only partially existed. Majority of teachers teach in untested areas.
- Few educators, including administrators, did not embrace the new system. Some districts created their own systems but most relied on state's program which resulted in more compliance than buy-in.
- Evaluators are not likely to give direct and honest feedback. Problem of school culture.
- All the state's charter schools waived out of the system.
-Wanted a new system to improve teaching , "we got an 18-page state rubric and a 345-page user guide for teacher evaluation.
- Put policy ahead of practice. Good in theory but unrealistic when it comes to implementation.
Take-Aways
- Colorado Senate Bill 10-191 - law required that 50 percent of a teacher evaluation be based upon student academic growth
- Teachers could gain or lose tenure based on the merits of their impact on student achievement.
- Many thought the law would allow the best teachers "to shine", be differentiated on an objective scale of effectiveness, lose tenure if they were not performing, and no longer be treated as interchangeable widgets.
- Backed by "Ivy League" research that made clear case for changes to former system.
- Funding from federal incentives, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other private philanthropy.
- Support came from both Republicans and Democrats as well as the American Federation of Teachers.
- Recently released results show that 88% of teachers were rated effective or highly effective, 4% were partially effective, 7.8% were not rated and 1% were rated ineffective.
- New policy was built on data that only partially existed. Majority of teachers teach in untested areas.
- Few educators, including administrators, did not embrace the new system. Some districts created their own systems but most relied on state's program which resulted in more compliance than buy-in.
- Evaluators are not likely to give direct and honest feedback. Problem of school culture.
- All the state's charter schools waived out of the system.
-Wanted a new system to improve teaching , "we got an 18-page state rubric and a 345-page user guide for teacher evaluation.
- Put policy ahead of practice. Good in theory but unrealistic when it comes to implementation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)